Having a tattooing policy in your employee handbook will help you clearly define the appropriateness of body art in your organization, while staying within the parameters of the law. Prevalence A Pew Research Center report indicates that about 40 percent of adults between 18 and 29 have one tattoo, and 50 percent of those with tattoos have more than one. Of those who tattoo themselves, 18 percent have more than six tattoos.
It's the person who does the job, not the tattoo, piercing or suit. The most common reason businesses lose current clients is poor customer service.
Growth and productivity is directly affected by the character and qualifications of the individual. You wouldn't doubt the professionalism of GoogleQuicken Loansand Amazonbut they have a business casual dress code. Dozens of Fortune companies have employees coming to work in casual attire.
Even if employee's have a business professional attire dress code, they can still have visible piercings and visible tattoos in the workplace, none of which change their qualifications or character. As long as consumers felt they received the same quality and pricing they didn't care about staff covering piercings or covering tattoos for work.
A rule of thumb for piercings is if earrings are removed for health precautions then piercings should be removed as well. Some employers state employees with piercings play with their body jewelry at work and thus shouldn't have body jewelry in during work for health safety.
Gloves protect against all these contamination factors, including body jewelry, and federal law requires employees to wash hands after touching or handling contaminants. The main thing is tattoos and piercings should be held to the same standards as other similar contaminants.
If piercings are removed because of health concerns, but earrings, rings, bracelets, hair clips, necklaces are allowed, it creates a double standard. Covering tattoos for work, but not other abrasions, cuts and scrapes, creates a double standard. Companies around the world allow staff to have tattoos and piercings, but won't allow offensive body jewelry or offensive tattoos in the workplace in their business professional attire.
Think about it, if you wouldn't let an employee come to work with a certain expression or design on their shirt, then it's a logical conclusion you wouldn't allow them to display it in art form on their body either. Politics and religion are among the most "offensive" topics, yet the right to freedom of expression, thought, political affiliation, and religious practices should be protected.
Freedom of expression and the open marketplace of ideas is paramount to the illusion of peace gained from the impossible task of appeasing everyone everywhere. These are completely different from tattoos and piercings, and fall under body modifications in the workplace.
Allowing tattoos and piercings does not mean you allow body modifications. Three points should be made. First, it is a fine line to walk.
Body modifications are any alteration done to the human body, and breast implants, liposuction, hair transplants, and plastic surgery are all body modifications.
Deciding what body modifications in the workplace are beautiful can be a slippery slope. Secondly, there are literally hundreds of body modifications, and not all modifications are equal.
For example, there's a huge gap between permanent make up and horn implants, both of which are body modifications. Body jewelry in India, Great Britain or any other country is worn for the same reason: The purpose is often frightful in contrast to the purpose being for beautification.
In other words, tattoos, henna and piercings can't be found in the animal kingdom, but split tongues or sharpened teeth can be. There are universally frightful visual attributes. Haunted houses and scary movies are terrifying to individuals regardless of culture or geographic location.
A person who resembles a lizard or demon could equally frighten a house wife in the Netherlands or tribal native in Uganda.
This is why frightful body modifications are different from tattoos and piercings. Tattoos and piercings have never been attributed as a factor to workplace distraction in any case study or poll.
Tattoos and piercings do not decrease productivity or company growth by being distracting. Visit here for an article on distracting "unnatural" or colored hair in the workplace.
It can be anyone, but preferably someone you know. You'd never wear what they're wearing, and you'd never walk out of the house with the tattoos and piercings they have. You wouldn't feel comfortable, you might not feel beautiful, and you would feel odd around your friends or family.Even today, though, employers can have policies that prohibit visible tattoos in the workplace.
More and more workplaces, however, are relaxing such regulations. But more and more women are getting tattoos, some of which are visible, and the same interviewer may have an adverse reaction if a tattoo is visible on a female applicant’s ankle.
In this situation, an employer can be exposed to liability for sex discrimination if the presence of the tattoo .
Feb 26, · Looking at the research, we can definitely see that there has been progress towards the acceptance of tattoos in the workplace, but highly visible tattoos can still have a negative impact. The Support Tattoos and Piercings at Work movement stopping tattoo discrimination in the workplace.
Find interesting info, sign STAPAW petitions & volunteer. Whether you have a tattoo on your ankle, your upper arm, or your lower back, many employers see tattoos as taboo in the workplace. What do you think? There is a certain stigma against visible tattoos in the workplace.
Visible tattoos in the workplace are often thought of as a workplace taboo. But should SMEs abide by this stereotype, or will it lead to them missing out on talent?